Key actors — tap for context
Emir Suljagić
Bosnian journalist, director of the Srebrenica Memorial Center since October 2019
Why here: A day after the annual report on genocide denial was published, he called the summoning of 26 center associates the "most extensive action" directed against the institution
More info →
Srebrenica Memorial Center
memorial complex and foundation in Potočari, where more than 6,000 identified victims of the July 1995 genocide are buried (out of at least 8,372 in total)
Why here: Police summoned for questioning more than half of everyone who has ever worked for the center
More info →
Denis Zvizdić
Bosnian politician, Chairman of the Council of Ministers of BiH from 2015 to 2019, currently Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of BiH
Why here: He "most sharply condemned" the police action and called on the High Representative for BiH to provide an explanation
More info →Duška Jurišić
Deputy Minister for Human Rights and Refugees of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Why here: She is demanding that the authorities immediately disclose the legal basis for the interrogations and the status of the summoned individuals
Milorad Dodik
Bosnian Serb politician, longtime leader of the SNSD party and former President of Republika Srpska
Why here: In 2025 the Court of BiH convicted him and stripped him of office, but his party successor continues the same line toward the center
More info →
Siniša Karan
Bosnian Serb politician, tenth President of Republika Srpska for the SNSD party since February 2026
Why here: His taking office in place of Dodik brought no change in policy toward the Memorial Center — institutional pressure continues
More info →
Republika Srpska
one of the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina, with its own government, police, and prosecution
Why here: Its police in Zvornik and the prosecutor's office in Bijeljina ordered this round of questioning
More info →Summons a day after the report on genocide denial
Zvornik police, acting on the order of the District Public Prosecutor's Office in Bijeljina, sent summonses to more than half of all the people who, at various times, took part in running the Memorial Center. Klix.ba ↗ The reason given by the authorities changed over the course of the day — initially it was described as "gathering information" about the summoned individuals' involvement with the center, based on a prosecutorial decision from last year, and later police spoke of "suspected tax evasion." Detektor ↗In an official statement, the center described the action as "a serious form of institutional pressure and intimidation" and expressed concern that employees' personal data had leaked outside official channels. Suljagić explicitly linked the action to the previous day, when the center presented its annual report documenting a rise in cases of genocide denial and an organized lobbying campaign by the Republika Srpska leadership that disputes the genocide. Detektor ↗
Why the timing matters
The Memorial Center says that summoning more than half of everyone who has ever worked for it, all at once, is not a routine act — and Bosnian politicians read it the same way. Denis Zvizdić, Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of BiH, "most sharply condemned" the action. Instead of institutions guaranteeing the center's employees protection and undisturbed work, he said, such steps deepen legal uncertainty and distrust, do not help reconciliation or the rule of law, and raise questions about the police's real motivation. N1 BiH ↗The context is reinforced by political continuity in Republika Srpska. In February 2025, the Court of BiH convicted Milorad Dodik for failing to respect decisions of the international High Representative for BiH; the verdict became final on June 12, 2025, and on August 6 the election commission decided to end his term as President of Republika Srpska retroactively to that date. Following repeat elections, first held in November 2025 and partly rerun in February 2026, the commission confirmed in office his fellow party member Siniša Karan of the SNSD, the party Dodik had long led. Balkan Insight ↗ Duška Jurišić, Deputy Minister for Human Rights and Refugees of BiH, is therefore demanding that the authorities "immediately, clearly, and precisely" disclose the legal basis for the action, the status of the summoned individuals, and the reasons for the questioning — which has so far been lacking. N1 BiH ↗
Meanwhile, associations of genocide victims are demanding an urgent investigation into the entire matter, Faktor.ba ↗ while other politicians, quoted by Klix, speak of "politico-prosecutorial persecution" that proves Srebrenica needs a special legal status protecting both its memory and the people who manage it. Klix.ba ↗
Limitations of this account
This report relies almost exclusively on Bosnian media critical of Republika Srpska's policies (Klix, N1, Detektor, Faktor) and on statements from politicians who are programmatically aligned with the Memorial Center — which does not make it untrue, but it does mean the other side is missing. According to the reports available, neither the Zvornik police nor the Bijeljina prosecutor's office have so far provided a detailed written justification for the interrogations beyond a terse reference to last year's prosecutorial decision and the later mention of tax evasion — precisely what critics accuse them of. Until the legal basis is clarified, it cannot be ruled out that this is a legitimate, if clumsily communicated, investigation; but neither can politically motivated pressure be ruled out, of the kind repeatedly described — in reports from the High Representative for BiH (OHR) to the UN Security Council — as being directed against Bosnian institutions.What hotinfo is watching
- Will the OSCE or the EU delegation respond to the Memorial Centre's appeal?
- Will there be further summonses or a formal prosecution?
- What position will the High Representative for Bosnia (OHR) take?
- Will the case affect next year's commemorations in Potočari?
- Will the district prosecutor's office in Bijeljina publish written grounds for the questioning?Prokuratúra sa ozvala 18. augusta: oficiálne vyšetrovanie údajného daňového úniku Memoriálneho centra podľa nej vôbec nie je otvorené, výsluchy však pokračujú a podnet bol anonymný. Písomné odôvodnenie samotných predvolaní nezverejnila — Memoriálne centrum sa muselo 12. augusta samo pýtať, ako prokuratúra s anonymným podnetom naložila. https://www.klix.ba/vijesti/bih/tuzilastvo-u-bijeljini-saopci…
